top of page

Diversity of Thought: Fresh Thinking for Real Change.

Workplaces thrive on fresh thinking, but fear can make them stale. 

Many organisations say they value innovation, creativity, and problem-solving. Yet too often, they hire from the same social and professional circles, producing teams that look different on the surface but think in very similar ways. Without diverse thought, strategic blind spots go unchallenged, assumptions become policy, and businesses plateau.


Inclusive hiring of people with criminal records, especially prison leavers, directly tackles this problem. Not just because of demographic diversity, but because of cognitive, emotional, and experiential depth that traditional candidate pipelines rarely offer.


Prison Leavers as Uncommon Problem Solvers

People with lived experience of prison have navigated survival environments, complex power dynamics, and often bureaucratic systems that can feel arbitrary and disempowering. Many have developed resourcefulness under pressure, emotional intelligence through conflict, and resilience in isolation, all which are leadership qualities disguised as liability.

By bringing prison leavers into your team you’re not just adding another viewpoint, you’re adding someone who can think outside the box, who sees risk differently, and who may ask different and challenging questions. That’s diversity of thought in action. Hiring people who have a criminal record isn’t about charity; it’s about strategic advantage.


Fresh Thinking can be Costly

Thinking alike may feel safe, but it’s has the potential of being a silent liability. When teams avoid uncomfortable conversations or hire based on background and experience, they can stagnate. They risk missing emerging trends, can misinterpret stakeholder needs, and may replicate old errors with new branding.


Inclusive hiring forces a shift. It brings in voices that challenge assumptions about customers, policies, and operations. When prison leavers have the chance to contribute meaningfully, their influence reaches far beyond their job title; it reshapes organisational norms.


Reducing Reoffending Through Belonging

Diversity isn’t just about internal benefit, it also has a ripple effect. One of the strongest predictors for reducing reoffending is the feeling of belonging; socially, professionally, and economically. When someone with a criminal record feels seen, heard, and valued, the outcomes shift.


Employment becomes more than a job, it becomes a stabilising structure. Just consider all the benefits that employment gives you: economic stability, a community, a sense of purpose, and so on. When that job also encourages authentic contribution, it strengthens identity. That has measurable impact: on motivation, choices, and community wellbeing. Employers who understand this don’t just reduce risk, they reduce reoffending.


Reframing Risk: Fear or Function?

Some employers hesitate: Will this person challenge the status quo too much? Will colleagues feel uncomfortable?

It’s worth asking: when did discomfort become synonymous with danger? Great ideas often start in friction. And strong cultures aren’t built by everyone getting along, they’re built by everyone feeling safe to disagree. Hiring prison leavers won’t dilute culture, it will reveal what your culture is really made of. Many employers who have hired people who have a criminal record state that they get on well with their colleagues and have integrated well into the team.


Practical steps you can take right now

  • Identify your decision-making structures: Where are the blind spots? Who’s missing from your strategy table?

  • Audit your hiring filters: Are lived experiences viewed as risk or insight?

  • Facilitate dialogue: Create cross-team conversations where challenging norms is encouraged.

  • Celebrate cognitive diversity: Not just neurodivergence, but emotional and experiential variance.


If your workplace is built to innovate, but everyone’s thinking the same, are you really evolving or just recycling comfort?

Diversity of thought isn’t a buzzword, it’s a disruption. Avoiding prison leavers may feel sensible, but what innovations are you sacrificing for the sake of predictability?



Comments


bottom of page